Search for: "Donald Richey" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
"Supreme Court declines case accusing Donald Rumsfeld of torture; The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal arguing the US government violated the constitutional rights of citizen Jose Padilla by detaining and subjecting him to harsh interrogation as an enemy combatant suspected of having links to Al Qaeda": Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has this report. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:08 pm
Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Appeals court allows US citizens' torture suit against Rumsfeld; The judges ruled 2-to-1 that two US citizens can bring a civil suit against former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their alleged torture while they were held in a US military prison in Iraq in 2006. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:28 am by David Haenel
Donald Hancock was found not guilty of DUI by a jury of his peers but that wasn’t good enough to save him from a violation of probation charge that has landed him a 12 year prison sentence. [read post]
The Department of Justice (DOJ) Friday asked the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to end a special master review of thousands of documents that the FBI seized from former President Donald Trump’s Florida estate. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 5:15 pm by Tom Smith
In October, the Boise mayoral candidate Wayne Richey proposed at an election forum to build a $26 billion wall to keep out people moving from the Golden State. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:30 am by Howard Iken
Numerous pundits have touted an endorsement from President Donald Trump as putting DeSantis over the edge. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:08 am by Howard Iken
So if a possible modification attempt or defense against one is on the horizon, consideration of the new tax laws could also be a factor, according to Ayo & Iken New Port Richey Attorney Bruce Przepis. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 6:50 pm
" Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined "Two formidable lawyers to spar at Supreme Court over health care reform law; Two attorneys will handle the lion's share of the arguments before the Supreme Court in the Obama health care reform case; In one corner, US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli; In the other, the indomitable Paul Clement. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 2:45 am by jonathanturley
Notably, Donald Trump has criticized his own appointees recently for adverse decisions. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, as Lyle Denniston of this blog reports, last night Donald Verrilli was confirmed as Solicitor General, succeeding now-Justice Elena Kagan and Kagan’s deputy, Acting Solicitor General Neal K. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
According to the proxy statement, directors were paid the following amounts: Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($) All Other Compensation ($) Total ($) John Baker II 82,000 157,500 0 0 239,500 Robert Brown* 17,500 37,500 0 0 68,540 Peter Browning 74,500 157,500 0 1,250 233,250 John Casteen III 85,000 157,500 1,000 243,500 Jerry Gitt 85,000 157,500 0 1,500 244,000 William Goodwin Jr. 74,500 157,500 0 2,000 234,000 Maryellen Herringer 74,500 157,500 3,074 0 235,074… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
Schwinn of the Constitutional Law Prof Blog reports that Jose Padilla filed a cert. petition seeking review of the Fourth Circuit’s decision barring his lawsuit against former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld; Lyle covered the filing on Monday for this blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
 And in an op-ed at the Washington Post, Donald Ayer argues against the idea that judges should be evaluated by their ability to mechanically apply the law to the instant case. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Feldman takes to task some of the recent critics of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli: “The only good measures of a Supreme Court advocate are whether he has made the best arguments in favor of his position and whether the justices understand those arguments. [read post]